HRC40: Joint oral statement on the gendered dimensions of privacy

Image source: APC, Feminist Principles of the Internet (https://feministinternet.org/en/principle/privacy-data) Image source: APC, Feminist Principles of the Internet (https://feministinternet.org/en/principle/privacy-data)

 

Fecha de publicación: 
Marzo 2019
Author: 
Association for Progressive Communications and Association for Women's Rights in Development

Oral statement delivered under Item 3: Clustered Interactive Dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy

and the Special Rapporteur on cultural rights

 

UN Human Rights Council 40th session

1 March 2019

 

Speaker: Daniela Marin Platero

Thank you, Mr. President.

The Association for Progressive Communications and the Association for Women's Rights in Development commend the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy for taking on the critical issue of the gendered dimensions of privacy, the first results of which are contained in the mandate’s current report.

The right to privacy is a fundamental human right, to be enjoyed by all. However, a person’s experience of privacy is very much shaped by their gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression. The collection, processing and exploitation of data, by both state and non-state actors, are not gender-neutral acts. In the digital age, we see offline misogyny, heteropatriarchy and gendered injustices not only replicated, but also exacerbated and taking on new forms. These include online violence, harassment, blackmail, entrapment, profiling, discrimination and censorship.

Those who hold more power and privilege in society are afforded more privacy, which is why it is critical that states take an intersectional approach in their development of privacy frameworks which recognise the specific experiences and threats to privacy experienced on the basis of gender, race, ethnicity, class, and other social and cultural hierarchies. We agree with the Special Rapporteur that gender-based breaches of privacy are a systemic form of denial of human rights, are discriminatory in nature, and frequently perpetuate unequal social, economic, cultural and political structures.

However, this need not be the case. With gender-responsive privacy frameworks, comprehensive protection for the use of secure digital communications, developed with instead of for women and LGBTIQ people, among other measures, digital technologies can enhance the rights of women and LGBTIQ people, offering them more freedom to develop their identities, explore their sexuality and enjoy a range of rights. The Yogyakarta+10 Principles, which the Special Rapporteur references in his report, provide guidance to states in this regard.

We address the following questions to the Special Rapporteur:

  1. Can you elaborate on practical steps that states can take to make gender a key consideration for the development and enforcement of data protection frameworks?

  2. What are the implications and consequences of the current developments in artificial intelligence for women and LGBTIQ people?

Thank you, Mr. President.

 

« Volver