An audible victory for human rights

Tunis, Tunisia

It has been a crazy tiring, hectic and running-around day, so I am hoping to give a small glimpse at least before I pass out into oblivion. So, after working on this process for close to seven years, we are finally tying up the ribbons and signing on the dotted line with icing. Yes, it is Source: APC ICT Policy Handbook and APC Annual Report 2005.">WSIS

II opening!
It has been a crazy tiring, hectic and running-around day, so I am hoping to give a small glimpse at least before I pass out into oblivion. So, after working on this process for close to 7 years, we are finally tying up the ribbons and signing on the dotted line with icing. Yes, it is WSIS II opening!

Of course, many impressive words have to officiate the event, and there were speeches from Mr. Zine El Abidine Ben Ali (President of Tunisia), Mr. Kofi Annan (Secretary General of UN), Mr. Samuel Schmid (President of Switzerland), Mr. Yoshio Utsumi (Secretary General of International Telecommunication Union, Source: ITU">ITU

), Ms. Shirin Ebadi (President of the Defenders of Human Rights Center speaking on behalf of the Civil Society), Mr. Craig Barrett (Chairman of the Board of Intel Corporation speaking on behalf of the Business Community) and Mr. Janis Karklins (President of the Preparatory Committee of the Tunis Phase of WSIS).

Quite apart from the gender disparity which I will choose to ignore here -- in my mind, Shirin Ebadi makes up for a million men! But I could be biased.. =|) -- what could potentially be a very boring session turned out to be explosive!

There was strong critical language on the suppression of human rights, particularly on protection of GenderIT.org and APC Internet Rights Charter">freedom of expression

. I was expecting Shirin Ebadi in top form, being a strong advocate of democracy and human rights especially on the struggle for the rights of women and children, and being recognised through the Nobel Peace Prize in 2003. But I have to admit, Mr Schmid took me by surprise.

He stated, "It is unacceptable that the UN has still has members that harass or imprison their citizens because they criticise them on the Source: TechSoup Glossary and GenderIT.org">internet

. The freedom of speech has to be respected. Everyone has to be able to express their views freely. It is one of the crucial conditions for this conference to succeed."

With that, he is basically questioning both the legitimacy of UN members who violate fundamental human rights as well as UN as a global institution that is supposed to ensure the protection of these rights.

Situated in the context of very real silencing of the rights to expression and opinion and the freedom to assembly by Tunisian activists and advocates, this can be read as directly alluding to a criticism of the Tunisian "state" in this glossary). As a general rule, "government" should not be capitalised.

Source: Wikipedia">government

– without actually naming them as such.

But I like the non-naming. The principle raised applies to all other governments who have, especially recently, shut down websites and imprisoned bloggers.

This draws the connection between the particular site of the issue in Tunisia to the larger State tactics employed by different (and growing numbers of countries) countries in using a variety of laws in attempt to curb the Internet’s potential for production and dissemination of information, knowledge and opinions.

Well said Mr. Schmid!

Shirin Ebadi also saved the day. Not once, but twice!

A splice from her speech, “The other subject which is of concern to us, is the control of access to the internet which is primarily situated in Western countries. What guarantee is there that the governments of those countries would not deprive internet acces as part of an econonmic regulation or embargo. Another problem is censorship. Certain governments under the pretext of maintaining national "African journalists trained in how to communicate securely online" (APCNews and Toni Eliasz, 30 September 2004), Take Back the Tech! and APC Internet Rights Charter">security

or to prevent illicit trades filter the internet, therefore preventing people from getting information they need and their voices to be heard from the other side. Even worse, they tend to supress any kind oif authors that critise their goverments in any ways. Unfortunately in some countries human rights defenders and writers are imprisoned, there only crime being the exercise of freedom of expression.”

She rocks my world! =D

The Tunisian League for Human Rights arranged for a press conference at 4:00pm in a persistent attempt to bring greater visibility to the human rights situation in Tunisia. After the fracas of trying to even have a preparatory meeting, we were unsure if anyone was even allowed to enter their office (where the event was to be held).

We went prepared for confrontation with the police, and indeed encountered many plains-clothed men, strangely loitering aroud the area with walkie-talkies, but was surprised at the ease that we were able to have the press conference.

So many people turned up. Heads of State, international press, Tunisian rights activists, the international community participating at WSIS… it got so crowded that we were spilling out of the small office, standing on tip-toe, straining our ears to hear the speeches.

The reasons for this could be many, but I will stick to the one I think is just great tactic.

The event was announced as a reception by Shirin Ebadi, to be held at the office of the Tunisian League for Human Rights. News of the press conference was transferred mainly by word of mouth.

How then, would it be possible, for heavy-handed obstruction of entry to a reception held by a Nobel Peace Prize Laureate? It would be a huge global PR disaster for the Tunisian government if this should happen.

This is when she becomes a symbol for the values and principles that she has so long struggled for as an activist on a daily basis, just like those of us sitting on the bus and getting lost trying to find our way to the office, or the individual rights advocates who continue to fight for fundamental freedoms in the midst of open and sometimes violent hostility.

How mind-blowing is it that tactics such as the Nobel Peace Prize is able to transform an amazing but pretty much globally invisible individual to become a symbolic bridge that can effect real difference?

I am still wondering. Either way, it has been a good day for human rights. A much needed drink of fresh waters after feeling suffocated and parched since I first stepped through the threshold of a big white tent.

No votes yet

Registrarse en APC.org