Call for dialogue: Regulatory frameworks for improving access
MONTEVIDEO, URUGUAY, 22 October 2007
What key actions could telecom and Source: APC">ICT
regulators undertake to promote access to infrastructure at local, national and regional levels? Send dialogue comment for posting to dialogue [at] regulateonline.org“Regulatory Frameworks for Improving Access” – Workshop presented by APC, IDRC, and LIRNE.NET
This dialogue is being undertaken in preparation for the “Regulatory Frameworks for Improving Access” workshop co-hosted by the Canadian International Development Research Centre (IDRC), the Learning Initiatives on Reforms for Network Economies (LIRNE.NET), and the Source: APC website">Association for Progressive Communications
(APC), at this year’s Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is a forum for multi-stakeholder policy dialogue on how the internet is run. It was set up at the end of 2005 by the United Nations Secretary-General following a resolution made by governments at the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS).Style information: N/a
Source: APC">IGF. The workshop will explore the key regulatory issues and imperatives in promoting equitable deployment and affordable access to Source: TechSoup Glossary and GenderIT.org">internet
(communications) infrastructure at local, national, regional and global levels.Background
Regulation is how policies are put into practice. However, experience has shown that there is not necessarily a trouble-free transition from the conceptual to the real world. For telecom (and other sectors) despite expectations of market solutions to improve infrastructure development and deployment, there are still substantial access gaps beyond the reach of the market, especially in rural areas.
LIRNE.NET and APC invite internet and telecom practitioners, APC">ICT policy
1. Whose jurisdiction? The role of regulation in addressing the international gap - international SearchTelecom.com">backbone
infrastructure deployment and interconnection.2. Issues and/or challenges in regulating regional (cross-national) communications infrastructure.
3. Trade-off or complementary objectives? Regulating for infrastructure investment and/or regulating for equitable access.
4. Access at the local level – definition of universal access and mechanisms for attainment.
Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF), a medium for Style information: APC uses multi-stakeholder with a hyphen between "multi" and "stakeholder".
Source: Frequently Asked Questions
about Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships in ICTs for Development: A guide for national ICT policy animators">multi-stakeholder
(END/2007)

