ICT for All? Really?

At the end of the day, Maxigas and I decided to take a walk and survey the images of women, men, elderly people, young people and disabled people at the Source: APC">ICT

4 All Exhibition hall. Afterall, the claim is that ICT is for all right? So who is this 'all' we are talking about.

At the end of the day, Maxigas and I decided to take a walk and survey the images of women, men, elderly people, young people and disabled people at the ICT 4 All Exhibition hall. Afterall, the claim is that ICT is for all right? So who is this 'all' we are talking about.

We didn’t have much time, so please bear in mind that this is a rough overview survey, and not very nuanced.We didn’t include representations of race or ethnicity, regional locations or whether the booths were "state" in this glossary). As a general rule, "government" should not be capitalised.

Source: Wikipedia">government

, private sector or civil society.

The method is coarse and simple, we merely checked if the booth had pictures of women, men, young people, elderly people or disabled people, and if the booth had any pictures that fit into the categories, we counted it as one respectively.

There are about 161 booths listed in the the main exhibition map. Most of them were still in the process of being built and populated, so I doubt we surveyed that many. We were also chased out of the exhibition hall before we could survey the second exhibition hall.

Anyway, caveats aside, these are the results of our critical, though cursory eyes (tah dah!):

* Women: 45

* Men: 40

* Young people (including children): 39

* Elderly people: 10

* Disabled people: 1

So, at a glance, it would appear that it is impossible to speak about the potential of ICTs (whether for development, e-Europa glossary">governance

, community building and a million other technology-promised utopias) without at least showing an image of women.

However, we took into account even images of women who did not have anything to do with technology, i.e. pictures of women holding scarves in the wind, having pots on their head, carrying children and so on. Likewise with men and elderly people (we included portraits of Heads of States when they are displayed on the booth).

Interestingly, although women were highly represented in images, only about eight booths specifically mentioned women as an important or priority constituent in their work. Quite unlike young people who were mentioned almost at every instance their portrayal was marked.

Youth and children are evidently important groups for the shaping of The Future when it comes to ICTs. Very different from the elderly, who are marginally represented. Maybe it’s because they are old, the future (morbidly) cannot contain them.

But if we are building an Information Society, then knowledge has to come from somewhere. Technological tools and solutions may amplify or atrophy knowledge, but surely people of all ages are personally and socially invested to be included in the making of this ‘brave new world’.

Disabled people.. well, one booth had a poster on projects specifically for the visually impaired. And that’s about it. I think this speaks volumes on its own.

ICTs for All?

Humph!

No votes yet

Sign in to APC.org